This week’s blog entry discusses Justice Thomas with Justice Gorsuch joining concurring opinion in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, here. By now, you most likely know that the opinion for the Court written by Justice Jackson, holds that a higher standard of proof is not in order if you are from a
Tynes v. Florida Department of juvenile Justice
A Two for One: Huber en banc and Magic Mushrooms
By William Goren on
Before getting started on the blog entry of the week, housekeeping matters. Next week I will be traveling most of the week, so do not expect a blog entry from me next workweek. Also, I just did an hour long interview with Claudine Wilkins, Esq., where we had a fantastic discussion about the federal and…
Hostile Environment Claims are Viable Under Both the Rehabilitation Act as well as the ADA
By William Goren on
Before getting started on the blog entry of the day, I will be out of town not this week, but the week after this week. So, I am not sure if I will get a blog entry up for the next week. I would have to do it next Sunday, but I will also be…
But For Causation and Motivating Factor are Two Different Things
By William Goren on
Posted in 504, ADA, Federal Cases, Rehabilitation Act, Title I, Title II, Title V, Title VI of Civil Rights Act, Title VII
I have been absolutely slammed this week, which is why I am so late in getting a blog entry up for the week. Before getting started on the blog entry for the day, I do want to mention that the Department of Justice has now issued a final rule on website accessibility involving Title II…
Court Says Reasonable Accommodation Request Must Relate to Essential Job Functions, But Did it Really Have to Draw That Conclusion?
By William Goren on
Today’s blog entry is one of those situations where I read a case and asked myself whether the court could have gotten to the same place more elegantly than the way it did. The case of the day is Bruno v. Chasity Wells-Armstrong, here, decided by the Seventh Circuit on February 23, 2024. As…
Murray v. UBS Securities and its Possible Impact Upon ADA Jurisprudence
By William Goren on
The blog entry for the week is actually not an ADA case at all but it may have a substantial impact on the ADA universe. The case of the day is Murray v. UBS securities, LLC, a unanimous decision written by Justice Sotomayor, from the Supreme Court decided on February 8, 2024, here. It…
Convincing Mosaic as a Standard for Deciding Summary Judgment Motions Arrives
By William Goren on
Posted in 1983, 501, ADA, Federal Cases, Rehabilitation Act, State Cases, Title I, Title IV, Title IX, Title VI of Civil Rights Act, Title VII
I hope everyone is getting back into the swing of the new year. Next week, I will be visiting my daughter in between January term and second semester. I will be here Monday but leave Tuesday and back Friday. So, I am not sure of the timing of the blog entry for next week. This…