Today’s case, Kaswatuka v. United States Department of Homeland Security, a published decision from the Fifth Circuit that came down on August 2, 2021, here, deals with an issue we have not dealt with before in our blog. This case concerns a person who works as a security officer at the DFW international Airport.
Rehabilitation Act
Is Assessing Physicians for Cognitive Impairment Kosher?
By William Goren on
I was really busy this week on a pressing client matter. So, the blog entry for the week is a bit late, which occasionally does happen. This week’s blog entry is a response to a push by those very much leading the professional recovery program efforts to expand those efforts to include cognitive screening for…
Does the ADA and §504 Allow for Disparate Impact Claims: The View from the Ninth Circuit
By William Goren on
Posted in 504, ADA, Constitutional law, Federal Cases, Final Federal Regulations, General, Rehabilitation Act, Title II
Previously, I mentioned that the upcoming Supreme Court term will have two cases before it pertaining to the rights of people with disabilities. One of those cases asks the question of whether disparate impact claims exist under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act. On August 24, 2021, the Ninth Circuit over a dissent said that such…
Psychiatric Exams and Federal Employees
By William Goren on
Before moving on to the blog entry of the week, some of you may be wondering what happened to the comments section of the blog/website. The host of my blog/website has decided to discontinue that feature for the reasons mentioned here. While very few comments were made on each of the blog entries over…
A Pair of Related Doctrines and a Big Win for Persons with Disabilities
By William Goren on
Posted in 504, ADA, Constitutional law, Federal Cases, Rehabilitation Act, State Cases, Title I, Title II, Title III, Title V
Today’s blog entry is a discussion of two related cases. The comes from the first case comes out of the 11th Circuit. It is Behr v. Campbell, here, and it discusses the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. That decision is a published decision decided on August 12, 2021. The second decision is Lund v. Cowan,…
Can ADA and Rehabilitation Act be used to Overrule Anti-Masks Mandates/Laws?
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Federal Cases, Final Federal Regulations, Rehabilitation Act, State Statutes, Title I, Title II
On one of the local National Public Radio stations here in Atlanta metropolitan area, there is a show called Political Rewind. On that show, distinguished panelists (political consultants, former officeholders, political science professors, etc.), talk about what is going on in Georgia politics and nationally as well. Today, they were talking about Republicans in Georgia…
Ability of K-12 Public Schools to Regulate Off-campus Speech
By William Goren on
Let’s say you have a situation where you have a severely autistic individual, a person with Tourette’s, dyslexia, or some kind of severe learning disability, all of which can lead to anger when the person gets frustrated. To be clear, I am not saying that all persons with disabilities are prone to anger more so…
Temporary Disability, EEOC Charges, and an ADA/Rehabilitation Act Case Comes to the Supreme Court
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Federal Cases, Final Federal Regulations, Rehabilitation Act, Title I, Title II, Title III
Happy Fourth of July week everyone. Hope everyone had a great Fourth of July. I am sure many are taking the week off or having an extended holiday. Have fun and be safe.
Today’s blog entry is a three in one. In particular, we will talk about how do you figure out when a…
Naomi Osaka and Title III of the Ada
By William Goren on
As everyone knows, Naomi Osaka made news last week in a big way. One of the things that I saw is that labor and employment bloggers were using it as an analogy for how they would deal with something like this under title I of the ADA, such as here184192212213215215. Sports commentators, such as…
Reassignment is a Reasonable Accommodation of Last Resort
By William Goren on
Today’s blog entry deals with the question of what happens when an employer demands that an employee move to a different job without evaluating or completely assessing whether that employee is capable of performing his or her current job’s essential functions with or without reasonable accommodations. The answer to the question says the Fourth Circuit…