I started writing this blog on election day, which turned out to be very interesting by the end of it with President Trump winning both the popular and electoral votes. Of course, the next question is what does that election mean for persons with disabilities. We don’t know, but a few immediate thoughts come to
Behr v. Campbell
Courts Going to the Dogs
By William Goren on
I hope everyone had a fantastic Thanksgiving weekend. Today’s blog entry goes to the dogs literally. The blog entry talks about two different cases involving service animals and how the court system deals with them. My thanks to Prof. Leonard Sandler, clinical law professor at the University of Iowa Law School for sending along the…
Is There a Remedy When a State Court Judge Discriminates Against an Individual by Reason of Their Disability
By William Goren on
At least once a month, I get a phone call where a judge is treating a person with a disability in their courtroom in a hostile way. The person always wants to know what can be done about it and whether judges are allowed to do that. I have talked before going after the judiciary…
A Pair of Related Doctrines and a Big Win for Persons with Disabilities
By William Goren on
Posted in 504, ADA, Constitutional law, Federal Cases, Rehabilitation Act, State Cases, Title I, Title II, Title III, Title V
Today’s blog entry is a discussion of two related cases. The comes from the first case comes out of the 11th Circuit. It is Behr v. Campbell, here, and it discusses the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. That decision is a published decision decided on August 12, 2021. The second decision is Lund v. Cowan,…