Today’s blog entry comes out of the Eighth Circuit, where just don’t see a lot of ADA cases. This case, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Drivers Management, LLC, is a published decision decided on July 10, 2025, and can be found here. The case explores several topics including: 1) direct evidence; 2) logistical undue
Federal Cases
Inflexible Return to Work Policies Can Cost You Big Time
By William Goren on
Before getting started on the blog entry for the week, I want to wish those who are celebrating a happy and healthy Jewish new year. The new year starts this evening and culminates with the day of atonement next week.
The case of the week is Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company out of…
How Not to do the Interactive Process
By William Goren on
I am back in the office after taking an Alaskan cruise with a side trip to Denali National Park. Both are absolute bucket lists. If you have not done both, I highly recommend it. The scenery in Alaska is something that cannot be easily explained. If you have only done the cruise, definitely worth going…
Unions Can’t Hide Behind the Duty of Fair Representation When it Comes to ADA and Title VII Compliance
By William Goren on
Before getting started on the blog entry of the week, a housekeeping matter in order. I will be out of the office August 30-September 12, so this will be my last blog entry until the week of September 15.
This week’s blog entry raises the question of whether unions can hide behind the duty…
Kluge Latest Decision and it’s Potentially Huge Impact on ADA Failure to Accommodate Cases
By William Goren on
Unlawful Disclosure is a Separate Private Right of Action Under Both the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA and other stuff
By William Goren on
Posted in 501, 504, ADA, Federal Cases, Final Federal Regulations, FMLA, Rehabilitation Act, Title I
Today’s blog entry came down to a close call between two cases that were decided last week. In the first case, Robin Shea, of Constangy Brooks, discussed a religious accommodation case, here, which also has significant implications for the disability rights universe. I highly commend her blog entry. I do plan to blog on…
A Twofer: A Short Discussion of How Far the Honest Belief Rule Extends and What Constitutes a Judicial Act
By William Goren on
Today’s blog entry is a real short one. I actually have quite a pile of cases to blog on, but I ultimately decided to keep it short. In particular, I wanted to focus on a couple of different concepts that come up frequently. The first point arises in the case of Gray v. State Farm…
Regarded As Discussed with Clarity Rarely Seen Before and Adverse Action After Muldrow
By William Goren on
The ADA turned 35 this weekend. HAPPY ANNIVERSARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This week’s blog entry is a two-for-one. In the first case, we discuss a case, Meza v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, here, decided by the Eighth Circuit on July 25, 2025. In this case, the Eighth Circuit discusses the regarded as prong of the ADA…
Landlords Can Charge a Fee for ESA’s/Pets and the Impact of Loper Bright
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Administrative law, Constitutional law, Fair Housing Act, Federal Cases, Guidances, Title III
This week’s blog entry come to me courtesy of Clinical Law Prof. Emeritus Leonard Sandler of the University of Iowa Law School. It asks the question of whether a landlord can charge a pet deposit for an ESA (emotional support animal). Loper Bright also comes up as well. The case of the day is Henderson…
What Notice is Required to Activate the Mandatory Reassignment Process Assuming a Mandatory Reassignment Process Exists in the First Place
By William Goren on
I hope everybody had a great Fourth of July weekend.
Today’s blog entry deals with a couple of different questions. First, in a situation where a person can no longer do the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodations, is reassignment mandatory or is it subject to open competition? Second, what…