Today’s case raises the point that an EEOC charge needs to cover the claim. Further, don’t assume that just because there is a prior EEOC charge on file that a subsequent claim will be automatically covered. The case is Martinez v. University Medical Center. The case also has some other interesting points in it
Title V
Current User of Illegal Drugs Does Not Mean Actual Use When It Comes to a Recovering Addict
By William Goren on
I am back to my Monday postings. In my latest article, just published by the ABA GPSolo magazine, I discussed the legal parameters that an employer is faced with when it comes to dealing with an employee addicted to the Internet. This week’s case continues that line of thought, albeit with respect to alcohol…
Telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation: EEOC v. Ford Motor Company en banc Decision
By William Goren on
In a comment to this blog entry, I discussed the panel decision of the Sixth Circuit in EEOC v. Ford Motor Company where the panel held that telecommuting was a reasonable accommodation. Before proceeding further, I want to thank Jon Hyman for alerting me through his blog that the en banc decision came down…
Earll v. eBay and Cullen v. Netflix before the 9th Circuit: Perez matters NOW though nobody seemed to see it
By William Goren on
This week is a two fer. At 11 AM Eastern time, the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in Sheehan (my blog entry on that case can be found here). I promise that I will read the transcript of the argument and post my analysis this week.
This particular blog entry involves…
Can You Get Compensatory and Punitive Damages in Title II ADA Retaliation Claims
By William Goren on
Previously, I have written on whether you can get compensatory and punitive damages in ADA retaliation claims. That particular blog entry despite its title was restricted to title I claims of the ADA. That is, claims arising from employment. But what about title II claims of the ADA. That is, a retaliation claim arising from…
transvestism, transsexualism, gender identity disorders and ADA; True-False version
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Constitutional law, Final Federal Regulations, Title I, Title II, Title III, Title IV, Title V
First, a housekeeping matter. I will be away next week, and so the next blog you will see after this week, unless I somehow blog later in the week, will be two weeks from today. Recently, the constitutionality of the transvestism exclusion in the ADA has been in the news.
True or False:
1.…
Survivability of ADA claims II
By William Goren on
My last weekend was absolutely crazy. Then, client matters kind of took over. Therefore, I am later than usual in getting my blog up for the week. Glad to say, here it is.
In a recent post, I discussed the survivability of ADA claims. It all seemed pretty cut and dry. That is, look…
Survivability of ADA claims
By William Goren on
I
Intro and Facts
When I was trying to figure out what to write on this week, one of the cases that I came across involved Barbara Walters (Walters v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium Association, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13 (D. Virgin Islands, January 2, 2015)). Really, no kidding! Except, it is not THE Barbara…
A triple play: causation, adverse action and hostile environment all in one case
By William Goren on
Happy new year everyone!
Hope everybody had a happy and safe new year. Back to it!
Today’s case is Sherman v. County of Suffolk, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177780 (E.D. NY December 29, 2014). The case talks about numerous issues: causation under title I and title V of the ADA; adverse action under title…
Understanding ADA: Best of 2014 as Determined by You the Readers
Happy new year everyone!
As we turn to the new year, several of my fellow bloggers have taken a look back at the prior-year on their blogs. I thought that was an absolutely fabulous idea, and thanks to metrics, something that can be easily done. So here are the top 12 most popular Understanding the…