Some cases are excellent for providing a roadmap on what to do, other cases are good for getting new lessons so that you can take preventive steps to not run down that path. The particular case here is one of the latter. In Peters v. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 2012 WL 3878601
title II
Can you be subject to title II and title III at the same time?
By William Goren on
I love to follow sports. Accordingly, over the years, I have found a way to combine my interest in sports with the Americans with Disabilities Act. As far back as the first edition of my book, which is now in its third edition and I am working on the fourth, I have always had a…
Preventive law systems a must: title II and voting booths
By William Goren on
The axiom of preventive law is that we live in such a litigious society that you can’t prevent a lawsuit. However, you can take steps where if you get sued you can win that lawsuit. A case that illustrates as to what happens when you do not have preventive law systems is United Spinal Association…
Olmstead evolves
By William Goren on
In Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), United States Supreme Court held that it violated the Americans with Disabilities Act for for a State to have a system that did not allow persons with mental illness to be treated in the community. Since that time, the United States government has been very aggressive…
New York City taxi licensing regulations redux
By William Goren on
I previously blogged (if you want to read this particular blog entry in context, you will find the original blog entry plus what appears here at that link), about a decision whereby a District Court throughout the New York City regulations with respect to the number of accessible taxis that are required in violation of…
Are the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act the same?
By William Goren on
Case law dealing with the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act will often say say that the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act are governed by the same standards. Eg. Greer v. Richardson Independent School District, 2012 WL 833367, *12 fn 1 (fifth Cir. March 14, 2012). That said, are…
Is a Mixed Motive Jury Instruction Dead under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Rehabilitation Act?
By William Goren on
At the top of the legal resources section on this page, you will see a link to an article that I wrote regarding whether a mixed motive jury instruction is available under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A mixed motive jury instruction is an instruction that says that liability can exist if the plaintiff can…
Title II can’t be used to keep places that grow pot for medical purposes open
By William Goren on
Posted in Federal Cases, Title II
There has been a lot of discussion in the blogosphere, particularly among media, about the decision that just came down from the Ninth Circuit involving the efforts of the cities of Costa Mesa and Lake Forest in California to close down places that grew pot for medical purposes. The link to that decision is below…
Help wanted: ASL practitioners
By William Goren on
Posted in Title II
A fascinating case, Belton v. Georgia, 2012 WL 1080304 (N.D. Ga. March 30, 2012), recently came down from the northern district of Georgia. In this case, two people who were both deaf and suffered from mental illness sued the state of Georgia because the state of Georgia simply was not set up to accommodate…
Licensing regulations and the Americans With Disabilities Act
By William Goren on
Posted in Title II
Recently, the New York Times reported that a federal judge ruled that the city of New York must start approving taxi medallions so that more taxis were wheelchair accessible. After reading the article, I decided to go to the case itself, Noel V. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission, 2011 WL 6747466 (S.D.…