This blog entry can be divided neatly into two parts. In the first part, I play a game of true false based upon the issues that arose in the recent case of Attiiogbe-Tay v. Southeast Rolling Hills LLC, which recently came down from the United States District Court of Minnesota. The second part explores
title I
Access Now v. Southwest Airlines overruled by regulation? Department of Transportation, Internet accessibility, kiosk accessibility and the Air Carrier Access Act
By William Goren on
The issue of whether the Internet has to be accessible to a person with a disability is an issue that we have discussed before. One of the cases out there is the case of Access Now v. Southwest Airlines, 227 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (S.D. Fla. 2002), where the Southern District of Florida…
Service Dogs Redux: the Texas approach
By William Goren on
Without exception, or maybe a rare one, every day my blog entry on service dogs and the Department of Justice regulations dealing with them with respect to title II and title III entities, gets at least one visit from someone. That blog entry deals with the federal approach to service dogs with respect to title…
Mixed motive and title I redux
By William Goren on
One of my more popular blog entries is the blog entry discussing University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar. In that blog entry, I talked about how that decision necessarily means that mixed motive jury instructions are available with respect to ADA title I (non-retaliation) claims. We now have a case, Siring…
Does a resignation end an employer’s duty to accommodate an employee?
By William Goren on
Posted in Federal Cases, Title I
An employee learns that she has cancer. Shaken up by the diagnosis she returns to work the same day and tells the on-site coordinator of her diagnosis. The on-site supervisor then communicates same to the company’s administration and on-site operations manager for the regional area explaining that the employee has been sent home because of…
When it comes to licensing, can a public entity conduct its processes in a way that discriminates against persons with disabilities or in a way that mandate discrimination against persons with disabilities?
By William Goren on
Many years ago I represented a public entity that was the subject of an adverse licensing decision. In that particular situation, the public entity had a group home for persons with a certain type of disability. The Medicaid certification inspection was done in such a way so that the disabilities of the people living in…
Otherwise qualified and reasonable accommodation two different concepts?
By William Goren on
In the employment context, in order to be protected under the ADA, you have to have a disability and you also have to be qualified (until the amendments act the term was otherwise qualified but the meaning remains the same). Whether a person is qualified under title I of the ADA, depends upon whether that…
Some useful things to know about regarded as claims
By William Goren on
In order to get damages under title I of the ADA, you have to show intentional discrimination. In order to get damages under title II of the ADA, you have to show deliberate indifference. But what does intentional discrimination mean with respect to a regarded as claim? Must there be discriminatory animus or can there…
Affirmative action and persons with disabilities part two and did OFCCP set up a constititutional challenge to torpedo all of it
I do not normally blog more than once a week. You would be surprised how time-consuming writing a blog entry really is. Also, I don’t like to have blog entries that cannibalize each other. Rather, I like to have a blog entry get a chance to stand on its own for a while. That gives…
What does it mean to exhaust administrative remedies?
By William Goren on
Title I of the ADA requires that before a plaintiff can go to court they must first exhaust administrative remedies first. That means receiving a right to sue letter from the EEOC and filing your claim with the EEOC or an equivalent state agency within the requisite time period. It also means giving the EEOC…