This is an update to the blog entry that I previously posted. I am revising it because upon further review, it is NFL season after all (Go Falcons!; Go Cubs too!), I realized that confusion was created over when the amendments to the ADA went into effect versus when the final regulations of the ADA
retaliation
Alcoholism, Associational Discrimination, Retaliation, and Magic Words
By William Goren on
For my Jewish brethren, I hope everyone survived the gauntlet of the Jewish High Holidays, which ended last night. Again, wishing everyone and their families a happy and healthy new year.
Today’s case comes from the United States District Court’s Southern Division in South Dakota and it takes on issues of alcoholism as a disability,…
Proposed Rules of HHS Implementing the Affordable Care Act Dealing with Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Guidances, Proposed Federal Regulations, Rehabilitation Act, Title I, Title II, Title V
Before getting started on this week’s blog entry, I do want to wish everyone that might be celebrating the Jewish New Year next week a happy new year. Also, because I am one of the people celebrating the Jewish new year and will have family responsibilities all week, I am not anticipating putting up a…
Can Employees Trust Human Resources? Maybe That’s Not the Right Question? Timing of Reasonable Accommodation Request and Causation under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act Are Not the Same
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Federal Cases, Final Federal Regulations, Guidances, Rehabilitation Act, Title I, Title V
Robin Shea’s latest blog entry, which can be found here. Discusses some of the things people say about HR, including: “HR protect the company’s interests, not yours;” “if you go to HR, HR reports the complaint back to the manager and then you are labeled a malcontent;” “I have yet to see a human…
Failure to Promote, Failure to Accommodate, Retaliation, and Breach of Confidentiality As ADA Causes of Action
By William Goren on
Hope everyone had a great weekend. The deadline for submitting my blog for the ABA top 100 legal blawgs expired last night. A few have let me know that they have nominated me. Also, I know from last year that it is entirely possible that someone nominated me without letting me know. In either event,…
If This Decision Holds, Game Changer: Applicable Statute of Limitation for ADA Claims Redux
By William Goren on
I
Introduction
One of the publications that I subscribe to is Disability Compliance for Higher Education . It is an excellent publication for anyone involved with ADA compliance in higher education. Its audience is mainly University 504 and ADA coordinators, University administrators, and professors. One of the cases it featured in its most recent publication…
File/Amend an EEOC Charge As Often As You Have To and Other Goodies
By William Goren on
Today’s case raises the point that an EEOC charge needs to cover the claim. Further, don’t assume that just because there is a prior EEOC charge on file that a subsequent claim will be automatically covered. The case is Martinez v. University Medical Center. The case also has some other interesting points in it…
Current User of Illegal Drugs Does Not Mean Actual Use When It Comes to a Recovering Addict
By William Goren on
I am back to my Monday postings. In my latest article, just published by the ABA GPSolo magazine, I discussed the legal parameters that an employer is faced with when it comes to dealing with an employee addicted to the Internet. This week’s case continues that line of thought, albeit with respect to alcohol…
Iqbal/Twombly Pushback and When Might All of Operations of a Private Entity Have To Comply with the Rehabilitation Act
By William Goren on
Today’s case is a two fer. We explore two questions. First, if a complaint as originally drafted does not meet Iqbal/Twombly standards, whatever that is:-), does the plaintiff get the right to amend? Second, just what must be alleged in order to survive a motion to dismiss with respect to alleging that a private entity’s…
Telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation: EEOC v. Ford Motor Company en banc Decision
By William Goren on
In a comment to this blog entry, I discussed the panel decision of the Sixth Circuit in EEOC v. Ford Motor Company where the panel held that telecommuting was a reasonable accommodation. Before proceeding further, I want to thank Jon Hyman for alerting me through his blog that the en banc decision came down…