My most popular blog entry this quarter by far is whether you can get compensatory and punitive damages for retaliation claims, which can be found here. This week’s blog entry explores a different topic but related, which is whether a corporation can bring a retaliation claim and not just an individual. Our case today
Title I
The Double Whammy of Pregnancy and Disability after Young v. UPS: EEOC Steps in
By William Goren on
This is an update to the blog entry that I previously posted. I am revising it because upon further review, it is NFL season after all (Go Falcons!; Go Cubs too!), I realized that confusion was created over when the amendments to the ADA went into effect versus when the final regulations of the ADA…
ADA and the “Sports Association.”
By William Goren on
For years, I refereed and umpired basketball and softball. The entity for managing the referees and umpires were associations whose sole purpose was to deal with the referee side of things. Referees and umpires were ostensibly independent contractors (whether they are would be the subject of a separate blog entry and will not be the…
Alcoholism, Associational Discrimination, Retaliation, and Magic Words
By William Goren on
For my Jewish brethren, I hope everyone survived the gauntlet of the Jewish High Holidays, which ended last night. Again, wishing everyone and their families a happy and healthy new year.
Today’s case comes from the United States District Court’s Southern Division in South Dakota and it takes on issues of alcoholism as a disability,…
Proposed Rules of HHS Implementing the Affordable Care Act Dealing with Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Guidances, Proposed Federal Regulations, Rehabilitation Act, Title I, Title II, Title V
Before getting started on this week’s blog entry, I do want to wish everyone that might be celebrating the Jewish New Year next week a happy new year. Also, because I am one of the people celebrating the Jewish new year and will have family responsibilities all week, I am not anticipating putting up a…
Changing Role of Expert in ADA Matters?
By William Goren on
I
Intro
Prior to the amendments to the ADA, a person with a disability had to prove that they had a physical or mental impairment that substantially limited a major life activity. A person with a disability still has to prove that. However, before the amendments a person under Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky v. Williams …
Can Employees Trust Human Resources? Maybe That’s Not the Right Question? Timing of Reasonable Accommodation Request and Causation under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act Are Not the Same
By William Goren on
Posted in ADA, Federal Cases, Final Federal Regulations, Guidances, Rehabilitation Act, Title I, Title V
Robin Shea’s latest blog entry, which can be found here. Discusses some of the things people say about HR, including: “HR protect the company’s interests, not yours;” “if you go to HR, HR reports the complaint back to the manager and then you are labeled a malcontent;” “I have yet to see a human…
Failure to Promote, Failure to Accommodate, Retaliation, and Breach of Confidentiality As ADA Causes of Action
By William Goren on
Hope everyone had a great weekend. The deadline for submitting my blog for the ABA top 100 legal blawgs expired last night. A few have let me know that they have nominated me. Also, I know from last year that it is entirely possible that someone nominated me without letting me know. In either event,…
Let’s Talk about Arbitration
By William Goren on
This week’s blog entry is going to be talking about several issues pertaining to arbitration. Before we do that though, I do want to let all my readers know that the ABA blawg 100 nominations are open again. I was very honored to be a part of the ABA Blawg 100 last year in the…
File/Amend an EEOC Charge As Often As You Have To and Other Goodies
By William Goren on
Today’s case raises the point that an EEOC charge needs to cover the claim. Further, don’t assume that just because there is a prior EEOC charge on file that a subsequent claim will be automatically covered. The case is Martinez v. University Medical Center. The case also has some other interesting points in it…